6 reviews for UrbanDictionary are not recommended

These reviews are not recommended because our content quality algorithms have determined them to be less useful for users researching this business. Our content quality algorithm makes decisions based on a number of proprietary evaluation factors, and is constantly updating and improving over time. Even though these reviews are not displayed by default, they still factor into the overall number of reviews and the average rating for the business.

U D.

1 review

3 helpful votes

Dont bother m8

April 29, 2020

Useless piece of sh1te

Update:
Aside from the s3x cr@p
Getting your def published is a lottery. Some mods will accept. Some won't.

If it's up there (a very reasonable definition that didn't poke or mention any specific names, and HAD ALREADY BEEN APPROVED), the def can STILL be reported (yes, it's been "MODERATOR APPROVED", but it can still be removed? Not sure how that works)

Oh. And if your def gets removed. They won't email you. They won't tell you. They won't communicate with you. It'll just disappear. So you have to check if your def is still there. Monthly. Or weekly. And they won't reply to emails asking about the removal. It's "the internet of things" (website doesn't work, no reply to emails)

It's b0110cks.

Urban dicionary.com's website traffic stats have been going down, down, down over the past year. When you realise your submissions are declined (or that your existing definitions are removed), you close the window. Just a thought.

-------------------------

Orig review

If you're a moderator, and you know it... make a different decision from the other moderators.

It's a lottery. I mean. It's an "urban" dictionary/lottery

Don't take the website too seriously. It's an.'Urban'... thingy

And the site is ok... IF... you can actually get any of your reasonable definitions published IN THE FIRST PLACE. And there seems to be an awful lot of s##t that does get past the moderators. Whether or not you get your definition published, seems to depend an awful lot on which moderator checks your submission. I'm sure I would never claim that if you diss something they like (or support something they don't), that moderator will reject it. Your most powerful tool on this site is not your keyboard. Your definitions probably won't get published. Use your mouse clicks, vote on existing definitions. And look up the definition of 'urban dictionary editors'. I'm assuming there must be some moderators of UD, who are cheesed off with UD, and allowed those to get through.

Whether or not yours get published no doubt depends on who moderates it. If you post something..."honest", about a member of the opposite sex, then if the moderator has just been through a breakup with that opposite sex, yours might get through. If the moderator is a member of the opposite sex, maybe not. Such is life.

I've seen the same definition for the same word, posted by the same person, appear several times, on different dates.

Hardly bother posting content. Use the up/down vote buttons.
One thing about this site. It's useful for finding out what random internet slang is. It has a tendency for turning everything into s3x. So expect "table" to be turned into something to do with s3x. Or..."record player".

I published 2 definitions under the same login, I wanted to change this so that I had two logins with one definition each - there isn't a system to 'transfer' definitions, you have to unpublish from one login, and re-publish from the second login. I was... hesitant about doing this, because they (did after a while) answer my emails, and said they wouldn't be able to guarantee the same identical definition would be re-published from the second login. But it was.

So they couldn't guarantee that an identical definition from a different account would be published. Consistent moderators, huh? Also a small gripe, you can't change an email address associated with an account (UD say it's not really an account, it's a 'login')

Yeah the place is c**p.